Start here
The full explanation of this document type, including how it is versioned and published, sits on About functional agendas.
Capability list
Choose the scope that matches the system you are building or evaluating, then filter the list to the levels you care about. The link, the downloads, and the print view all follow whatever the filters are showing.
What this workflow covers, and where it ends
A person calls a published phone number. The system answers, tells the caller what it is, takes consent, collects who they are and what happened, classifies the legal issue, screens eligibility, checks for a conflict, and produces an intake record that staff can act on without calling the person back for the basics. At the widest scope the record flows into a document.
Three neighbouring workflows have their own agendas. Brief help question answering starts from a question rather than a caller. Referral routing scores and ranks services against capacity. Document assembly fills a form out. A single deployed product often crosses those lines, and the agendas stay separate so that conformance can be tested one workflow at a time.
Step one
What kind of system are you building or evaluating?
How to read the levels, and how to cite a capability
| Level | Keyword | What it requires |
|---|---|---|
| Required | MUST |
The system does this before it serves the public. A deployment that misses a required capability has a failure mode the field has already documented. |
| Critical | MUST |
A required capability where failure harms a person directly. These are the items to test hardest and to review by hand. |
| Extended | SHOULD |
There may be good reasons to skip one of these, and the reasons should be written down. Most are what a mature deployment adds after its first year. |
| Aspirational | MAY |
Few systems do these yet. They mark the direction of travel, and they are the capabilities most likely to change in the next version. |
The keyword column follows BCP 14, the convention used in internet specifications, where the capitalized words carry the requirement level and ordinary prose does not. The keywords appear in the CSV and JSON downloads so that they can be pasted into a solicitation or a grant condition.
Identifiers
Each capability carries an identifier in the form VOI-<task area>.<capability>,
for example VOI-4.2. Identifiers do not move or get reused inside a
version. A retired capability keeps its number and is marked retired rather than deleted.
Because numbers can change between versions, cite an item with the version attached:
VOI-4.2 (voice-intake v1.0). This follows the identifier rule used
by the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard.
Scopes
This agenda holds one catalog of 71 capabilities. Each of the five scopes is a selection over that catalog, stating which capabilities apply to a deployment of that shape and at what level. A capability marked not applicable is out of scope for that shape of deployment rather than unimportant. An organization can publish its own scope, saying what it requires locally, without forking the capability list.
Formats
This page is the reference view. The CSV and JSON downloads carry whatever the filters are currently showing, so a scope and level selection becomes a working checklist. The print view produces a PDF of the same selection. Every download records the version, the status, and the scope it came from.
Task areas and capability counts
Jump to a task area
Where this comes from, and how to comment
This agenda was compiled from the Voice AI Intake power group, which met monthly from March to June 2026, together with student evaluation frameworks, reviews of open-source implementations, published pilot data, and a white paper on AI-enhanced triage and intake. Contributors include practitioners from legal aid organizations, court self-help programs, statewide legal help systems, university research labs, and technology vendors.
Every recommendation here carries evidence from practitioner experience rather than from a large-scale validation study. Treat the document as a starting point for your own requirements, and tell us where it is wrong.
Draft for review. This agenda is being developed with the Voice AI Intake power group. It draws on practitioner input gathered from March to June 2026 and has not been formally validated. Send corrections and additions to legaldesignlab@law.stanford.edu.
The rest of the package
Other documents for this workflow
A functional agenda is one of the documents the Commons produces for each workflow. These are the others for voice AI intake.
- Step 2
Conformance standard
The thresholds, the review gates, and the conditions that stop a pilot.
- Step 3
Evaluation protocol and test suite
The call scenarios and the scoring sheet used to measure a system.
- Step 5
Reference implementation
An open-source voice intake build that teams can read, run, and adapt.
- Step 6
Masterclass
The course module for teams planning or running a voice intake deployment.
- Hub
Voice AI Intake hub
Everything in the package, plus the power group and the organizations building.