Step-by-step agenda

What a good system for problems with living conditions does

A tenant has mold or no heat, the landlord will not fix it, and stopping the rent is the thing that gets them evicted. Here is what a good system does, in order, with a question for you at each step.

This list comes from what the groups at a recent design workshop the Commons team ran said the work needs. Answer the questions on the parts you know from your own practice. The Commons team reads every answer, fixes what the list gets wrong, and takes the harder questions to the cohort working on this area.

The rest of this workflow package is here, with how this works today, what a good system does, and the assets the cohort is drafting.

Part 1

Hearing the story and explaining the safer path

The tenant arrives wanting to stop paying rent until the work is done, and that is the step that exposes them to an eviction for nonpayment. The first thing a system here has to do is explain the route their state actually allows.

What a good system does

What it must never do

What does a tenant have to do before they can use the rent remedy where you work?

Answer this

Part 2

Recording the condition as it happens

A tenant may have little record of a condition while it is happening, so by the time anyone needs evidence it is whatever they happened to keep. This part is the one that decides whether the case is provable later.

What a good system does

What it must never do

What evidence does your court actually want in a repair case?

Answer this

Part 3

Putting the repair request on the record

A conversation in the hallway or a text message is a common way to ask for a repair, and neither one starts the clock. The request has to be written, delivered in a way that can be proven, and dated.

What a good system does

What makes a repair demand count where you work?

Answer this

Part 4

Keeping the rent moving the way the remedy requires

The remedy usually depends on the rent continuing to move, whether that means paying into an account the court supervises, paying for the repair and deducting it, or carrying on paying while the claim runs.

What a good system does

What it must never do

What does a tenant in your jurisdiction do with the rent while a repair case runs?

Answer this

Part 5

Filing when the deadline passes

If the cure period runs out and nothing is fixed, the case goes in. Everything the filing needs was collected in the earlier steps, so this part is assembly rather than a fresh start.

What a good system does

What does a tenant have to file in your court to start a repair case?

Answer this

Part 6

Getting the condition inspected and the parties talking

An inspection turns the tenant’s account into a finding somebody else made, and bringing the parties together early is often what gets the work done without a hearing.

What a good system does

How long does it take to get an inspector out where you work?

Answer this

Part 7

Watching the repairs and releasing the money

The point of holding the rent is that the landlord feels the pressure while the tenant keeps their home, so the money moves only when the work is actually done.

What a good system does

Who decides that a repair is done where you work?

Answer this

Part 8

Showing that it works

The standards the cohort writes decide what counts as a system that worked here, and the measures below are the ones the groups asked for.

What a good system does

What would you need measured before you would put a tenant through this?

Answer this

What happens to what you write

Every note comes to the Commons team. We read it, correct what this list gets wrong, and publish a new version saying what changed. The questions that need practitioners to argue them out go to the cohort for this area, which writes the functional agenda and the standards from what comes back.

A note about one line is as useful as a note that adds a whole step. If what you know is the rent remedy your state allows, write about that.

The two agendas for this workflow

You are reading this one

Step-by-step agenda

This is the first round, and it collects what the people who do this work say a tool has to do, in the order the work happens and in plain words. Read it to argue with it, to correct it, and to say what your jurisdiction needs.

Not written yet

Functional agenda

The cohort writes the detailed specification after this round, using the answers that come back from this page. It numbers every capability, states the standard each one has to meet, and sorts them by the scope of the system being built, so a builder can build against it and an evaluator can test against it.

The cohort drafts this one next