Step-by-step agenda
A tenant is handed an agreement in the hallway minutes before an eviction hearing, with a lawyer on the other side and nobody on theirs. Here is what a good system does, in order, with a question for you at each step.
This list comes from what the groups at a recent design workshop the Commons team ran said the work needs. Answer the questions on the parts you know from your own practice. The Commons team reads every answer, fixes what the list gets wrong, and takes the harder questions to the cohort working on this area.
The rest of this workflow package is here, with how this works today, what a good system does, and the assets the cohort is drafting.
Part 1
The summons reaches every tenant, and right now it tells them almost nothing about where help is. Tenants who cannot read it, or who do not know they can appear, often do not come to court at all.
Who decides what goes on the summons in your court?
Part 2
Everything that could change the outcome, including rental assistance and a conversation with the landlord, has to happen before the hearing. The point of this part is to get to the tenant while there is still time.
How do tenants in your county get information before a hearing today?
Part 3
Tenants who come to court often do not know what rights they have, and cases turn on things nobody has looked at, including late fees and the condition of the home.
What do tenants in your court not know that changes the outcome?
Part 4
Nothing in the process today checks whether the schedule in the agreement is one the tenant can actually meet, and a schedule they cannot meet brings them back to the same courtroom.
What does a payment schedule a tenant can meet look like in your court?
Part 5
The hallway is where the agreement gets signed, so the help has to be standing there rather than waiting to be found.
How does a tenant at your courthouse find help on the day?
Part 6
The agreement is handed over minutes before the hearing, and a tenant signs something they have not read and nobody has explained.
What happens in the hallway at your courthouse before a hearing?
Part 7
A tenant walks out with a piece of paper and no account of what was agreed or what they were told, and the next person who helps them starts from nothing.
What do tenants need after the hearing that nobody gives them today?
Part 8
The groups were specific about how to judge a system here, and the measures below are what they asked for.
What would you need measured before you would send a tenant to this?
Every note comes to the Commons team. We read it, correct what this list gets wrong, and publish a new version saying what changed. The questions that need practitioners to argue them out go to the cohort for this area, which writes the functional agenda and the standards from what comes back.
A note about one line is as useful as a note that adds a whole step. If what you know is what happens in the hallway at your courthouse, write about that.
You are reading this one
This is the first round, and it collects what the people who do this work say a tool has to do, in the order the work happens and in plain words. Read it to argue with it, to correct it, and to say what your jurisdiction needs.
Not written yet
The cohort writes the detailed specification after this round, using the answers that come back from this page. It numbers every capability, states the standard each one has to meet, and sorts them by the scope of the system being built, so a builder can build against it and an evaluator can test against it.
The cohort drafts this one next